Skip to content

Policy brief · 22 January 2026

Departmental data quality: where comparability is lost

Identically named indicators are calculated differently across organisations. What to check before analysis begins.

A large share of analytical errors arises not at the analysis stage but earlier — when indicators that merely share a name are consolidated into one table. “Number of applications” includes repeat submissions in one agency and excludes them in another; “average processing time” is counted in calendar days here and in working days there.

The indicator passport

The minimum set of fields without which an indicator cannot be considered defined: a verbal definition, calculation formula, unit of measurement, source of primary data, frequency, cut-off date, responsible unit and the rule for handling missing values.

Introducing passports almost always exposes discrepancies the reporting parties did not suspect. It is an uncomfortable but necessary step: without it, any comparison between organisations remains a comparison of different quantities.

Request the material or an expert comment

If you need a detailed comment on the subject of a publication or access to the full methodology, send us a request.

Consent is given in accordance with the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Personal Data and its Protection No. 94-V of 21 May 2013.